Enacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 1

Introduction -LeslieWillcocks, Chris Sauer and Mary Lacity.- PART I. CRITICALRESEARCH.- Chapter 1: Doolin, B. (1998),"Information technology as disciplinary technology: being critical ininterpretive research on information systems," JIT, Vol. 13, pp. 301-311.- Chapter 2: Brooke, C. (2002),"What does it mean to be 'critical' in IS research?" JIT, Vol. 17, pp. 49-57.- Chapter 3: Brook, C. (2002),"Critical perspectives on information systems; an impression of the researchlandscape," JIT, Vol. 17, pp.271-283.- Chapter 4: Doolin, B. and Lowe,A. (2002), "To reveal is to critique: actor-network theory and criticalinformation systems research," JIT,Vol. 17, 69-78-. Chapter 5: Cecez-Kecmanovic,D., Janson, M., and Brown, A. (2002), "The rationality framework for a criticalstudy of information systems, JIT,Vol. 17, pp. 215-227.- PART II. GROUNDED THEORYAPPROACHES.- Chapter 6: Urquhart, C. andFernandez, W. (2013), "Using grounded theory method in information systems: theresearcher as blank slate and other myths," JIT,Vol. 28, pp. 224-236.- Chapter 7: Seidel, S., andUrquhart, C. (2013), "On emergence and forcing in information systems groundedtheory studies: the case of Strauss and Corbin," JIT, Vol. 28, pp. 237-260.- PART III. HISTORICALAPPROACHES.- Chapter 8: Land, F. (2010),"The use of history in IS research: an opportunity missed?" JIT, Vol. 25, pp. 385-394.- Chapter 9: Mitev, N., deVaujany, F.X. (2012), "Seizing the opportunity: towards a historiography ofinformation systems," JIT, Vol. 27,pp. 110-124-. Chapter 10: Bonner, W. (2013),"History and IS - Broadening our view and understanding: Actor-Network Theoryas a methodology," JIT, Vol. 28, pp.111-123.